September27, 2022

Abstract Volume: 6 Issue: 1 ISSN:

Knowledge, Attitude, and Practice of Final Dental Students towards Sharp instruments Injuries, Khartoum State - 2017

Namarig Samsaa Mohamed Fadl 1*, Dr. Elsadig Mahgoub Eltayeb 2

1. MD in dental public health 2018, In Sudan Medical specializations board, Khartoum - Sudan. B.D.S University of Khartoum (2009).

2. MBBS University of Khartoum (1969), DTPH University of London, UK (1976),
Personal Fellowship of Calgary, Canada (1979).

Corresponding Author: Namarig Samsaa Mohamed Fadl, MD in dental public health 2018, In Sudan Medical specializations board, Khartoum - Sudan.B.D.S University of Khartoum (2009).

Copy Right: © 2022 Namarig Samsaa Mohamed Fadl, This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Received Date: August 05, 2022

Published Date: September 01, 2022



Background: Globally 2 million healthcare workers are exposed to blood borne pathogens each year such as hepatitis B, hepatitis C and human immune deficiency virus,Dental practice represents an occupational hazard for injuries and transmission of serious infections. Dental students are generally considered at a higher risk because they undertake exposure prone techniques during their training years. The aim of this study was to assess the knowledge, attitude and practice of final dental students in Khartoum state.

Materials & Method: This was a cross sectional facilities based study. The study populations were composed of final dental students in Khartoum state with a sample of size 385. Self administered questionnaire was used to collect data. The data extracted were tabulated andanalyzed. The results were calculated on the basis of frequency and percentage using SPSS.

Result: The response rate was 100% and female constituted 74.55% of the sample. 67.27% of participants were exposed to sharp instruments injury.43.9% were fully vaccinated against hepatitis B .59% of those who participated knew about universal guidelines and most of students90% were aware about diseases transmitted by sharp instruments. The main tool causing injury was needle 59.5%. The local anaesthesia administration was the principle cause of injury 51.2% followed by endodontic treatment.

Conclusion: The findings of this study indicated the need for efficient training of dental students that encourages prevention of sharp injuries; compliance with standard precautions; preclinical HBV testing, immunization and efficacy testing; reporting of injuries and follow-up with provision of post exposure prophylaxis.

Keywords: sharp instruments, dental students, hepatitis B.



HCWs        Health Care Workers

HBV           Hepatitis B Virus

HCV           Hepatitis C Virus

BBV           Blood Born Virus

HIV            Human Immunodeficiency Virus

WHO         World Health Organization

NSIs           Needle Stick Injures

Knowledge, Attitude, and Practice of Final Dental Students towards Sharp instruments Injuries, Khartoum State - 2017


The effective infection control program in a health care environment is to implements policies and procedures that will protect both workers and patients against transmission of a variety of infectious diseases [1]. Workplace safety is a very important aspect of occupational health practice the Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) estimated that approximately 800 000 health care workers (HCWs) in the United States were injured by patient needles and about 2000 of those workers tested positive for hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection, 400 for hepatitis B virus (HBV) and 35 for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) [2].

Health care workers are exposed to hazardous blood born pathogen such as hepatitis B, hepatitis c and HIV. These viruses are serious public health problem that can consequence to psychological and occupational disease [3]. There are more than 20 pathogens are estimated to be transmitted through sharps instruments injuries. The greatest threat to health care worker is HBV, HCV, HIV infection, and others like syphilis, Blast mycosis, Brucellosis, Cryptococcus’s, Diphtheria, Malaria, TB, Prions, Ebola, Herpes, Mumps, Rubella, Rubella, Infectious Mononucleosis, Influenza, Swine flu and therefore should be evaluation immediately following treatment of the exposure site by a qualified health care professional [7].

Health care workers (HCWs) are at risk of exposure to a variety of blood-borne pathogens by needle stick and Sharp instrument or mucocutaneous contamination. and they susceptible to contracting infectious diseases while providing patient care if they do not use proper infection control procedures [5]. Sharps instruments injuries are wounds caused by needles and other sharp medical instruments (e.g. scalpel, blades and scissors) that accidentally puncture or cut the skin. Sharps and needles may only cause small wounds in the skin, but the effects can be worse. Such instruments come in contact with blood and other body fluids and may carry the risk of infection [6].

Blood-borne viruses (BBVs) can be transmitted occupationally from infected staff to patients, from infected patients to staff, or from patient to patient via contaminated instruments. The most common route of Transmission is from patients with a BBV to a member of staff following a needle sticks and sharp instrument injuries [8]. Standard precautions include the use of protective barriers such as gloves, waterproof gowns and aprons, water-repellent masks and protective eyewear, which can reduce the risk of exposure of the health-care worker’s skin or mucous membranes to potentially infective materials. In addition, under standard precautions, it is recommended that all health-care workers take precautions to prevent injuries caused by needles, scalpels and other sharp instruments or devices [3].

It is estimated that there are 35 million healthcare workers (HCWs) worldwide representing 12% of the working population. Two million injuries are believed to occur each year among HCWs. although sharp instruments injuries are preventable [11]. Dental practice represents an occupational hazard for injuries and transmission of serious infections Healthcare students is exposed to a number of occupational hazards in the workplace and injuries are a major concern. There is a high risk of exposure to pathogens among healthcare students while they become involved in patient’s investigation and treatment during their clinical training [12].

Dental students are generally considered at a higher risk because they undertake exposure prone techniques during their training years and use sharp instruments more often. Several studies had highlighted that knowledge among dental students was inadequate regarding prevention and management of sharps injuries. Lack of experience and skill in performing dental procedures during clinical training places dental students at risk of exposure to blood borne viruses (BBVs) [13].

Occupational exposure is cutaneous injury with contaminated sharp instruments such as needles or contamination of skin or mucosa to patients’ blood, saliva or other potentially infectious body fluids (mucocutaneous contamination) [14]. Blood-borne viruses (BBVs) can be transmitted occupationally from infected staff to patients, from infected patients to staff, or from patient to patient via 

contaminated instruments. The most common route of Transmission is from patients with a BBV to a member of staff following a needle sticks and sharp instrument injuries [7].

A needle stick injury is a percutaneous piercing Wound that set by a needle point, but possibly also by other sharp instruments or objects [15]. Health care workers (HCWs) are at risk of exposure to a variety of blood-borne pathogens by needle stick and Sharp instrument or mucocutaneous contamination [16]. 60 % of all injuries occurred in nursing personnel. Most injuries occurred during disposal of used needles (23.7%), during administration of parental injections or infusion therapy (21.2%), drawing blood (16.5%), recapping needles after use (12%), or handling linens or trash containing uncapped needles (16.1%) [17].

Needle stick injury is a significant problem in general practice and exposes general practitioners and practice nurses to a serious risk of infection from blood-borne transmissible agents. All patients should be considered to pose a potentially high risk of infection [15]. Needles and sharps injuries are commonly used during dental procedures; workers in the dental profession are especially prone to sharps-related injuries [18]. These injuries may cause fatal infections with blood-borne pathogens and are a serious occupational safety concern for healthcare workers [19]. Hepatitis B and C and HIV are threatening the health of thousands of healthcare workers. The most common mode of transmission of these diseases is sharp instrument injury [20].

Dental practitioners are more prone to the exposures due to close contact with the patients' oral cavity, frequent use of sharp instruments and working with high-speed rotary instruments that produce con aerosols [14]. Dentists are known to be a high-risk group for exposure to needle stick injuries, and most dentists experience at least one NSI during their Profession life [19]. These exposures predispose to more than 20 microorganisms that cause blood borne infections in which hepatitis B virus (HBV), hepatitis C virus (HCV) and human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) are reported to be the most common [14].

Most studies on the epidemiology of NSI among healthcare workers were focusing on non-dental professionals. The precise risks of NSI in dental healthcare environment were investigated less frequently. The routine use of sharp instruments in dental treatment, the presence of blood and saliva, and the diverse bacterial flora in the oral cavity all contribute to transmit the blood born disease. at a university hospital, dental procedures are frequently executed by students with lower occupational skills, making sharp injures an even more important issue for dental student [21].

Dental schools are responsible for providing appropriate infection control measures, proper training of dental students to protect patients, and for the establishment of safer work conditions [23]. In the clinical settings, lack of clinical knowledge and inadequate attention to Dental personal safety put students at high risk for occupational exposure to blood-borne pathogens through sharp instruments injuries. So pre-clinical undergraduate students often are prepared for the clinical area with the use of simulations in learning or skills laboratory before treating patients One third of all reported sharps injuries in dental practice are due to the use of no disposable dental syringes with most injuries being sustained during removal and disposal of the disposable needle from the non-disposable plunger [24].

The transmission risk is influenced by the type and number of microorganisms present in the blood, presence of visible blood on the needle, depth of the injury and size and type of needle used [25]. Knowledge of dental students about the risks associated with sharp instruments and the use of preventive measures was inadequate. The implementation of Universal Precautions, elimination of needle recapping, use of safer needle devices, and use of sharps containers for safe disposal will reduce the sharp injure [26].

Among dental students, most injuries involved a syringe needle followed by scalar and other dental instruments such as bur, explorer, scalpel, a suture needle and other devices. Recapping a needle and administering local anesthesia, and performing scaling and polishing procedures were the most important causes of sharp injures among dental students. Knowledge about sharp injures only 29% students correctly defined the sharp injures. Only 39% of students had reported the incident and the most common reason for not reported is fear of stigmatization and discrimination and fear of the consequences of such injuries. Despite a comprehensive educational programme and training for dental students, knowledge of inoculation injuries and associated issues remained inadequate. Thus it is important that the principles of infection control training and reporting of all NSIs continue to be emphasized throughout undergraduate dental education [29].

This study was about the knowledge, attitude and practice of sharp instrument injuries among final dental students in dental faculties in Khartoum State during 2017.


Study Design: This is a Cross sectional facilities-based study.

Study Area:  Faculties of dentistry in Khartoum State and there were (khartoum, Nelin, University Of Medical Science And Technology, University Of Science And Technology, and Alribat. International African university, Sudan international, Watnia, Nile College, Alrazi College Alyarmok College, Medical Science College.)

Study Population: Final Dental students in Khartoum state. (See table 2-1)

Inclusion criteria:

Final dental students present at the time of study

Exclusion criteria:

  • Absent student at research time
  • Those who refuse to participate

There are 13 dental faculties (see the table below). The sample was distributed proportional to number of final dental students in each faculty as shown in the following table:

Sampling Technique:

Systemic random sampling technique was used, in each faculty list of students was obtained. The first student was selected randomly. When students wasdivided by sample size in the faculty to get the sample interval then the second student was taken after counting for this interval and so on till sample was completed.

Data Collection Tools and Method:

Self-administered questionnaire was distributed to final dental students in facilities of dentistry in Khartoum State. A pilot study was conducted among a sample of other medical students (not part of the study) to pre-test the questionnaire to insure reliability and comprehensibility.

Data Analysis:

The collected data wascleaned, coded, entered in master sheet and analyzed by statistical package for social science (IBM SPSS Inc. Chicago, version no 23) software.

Chi –square test was used for comparing categorical data; level of significance was set at 0.05 or less, the tables were constructed using Microsoft word.



Several studies have reported on occupational injuries among dental students with variable findings.

It was found in this study adequate knowledge of final dental students towards sharp instruments injury (80%) in Khartoum state. About (67.27%) of final dental students in Khartoum state had contaminated sharp instruments Injury   like the study in Kudzu in South Africa where (20-80%) [40]. Were exposed and in India just (35%) had been exposed and in Mahatma (57%) the high percentage in Karachi about (73%)  were exposed to sharp instruments injury during practice [42].

In Mangalore it was found that (82%) of respondents were aware of blood borne diseases including HIV, hepatitis B and hepatitis C [3]. And this was lower than the present study (96%).

In this study only (32%) of final dental students knew about universal guidelines and in Chennai in the study of dental students (37%) approximately the same percentage [38].

In this study more than half of final dental students (69%) had attended infection control program which had increased their knowledge. Also (88%) of subjects in Saudi Arabia (Jeddah) were attending infection control course [24]

It was found in this study (74%) were aware about post exposure prophylaxis and in Chennai India (33%) not aware about post exposure prophylaxis [38].and in other study in Saudi Arabia (Jeddah) (79%) were aware of the taking post exposure prophylaxis [24]

In the present study the main cause for sharp instruments injury was due work load and carelessness and in others study lack of experience was the main reason of sharp instruments injury like in Karachi. [18].

Majority of participants in current study (44%) were not knowing how and to whom report injures believing that reporting injury would not influence the outcome and  similar study in Ajman was found the main reason for not reporting was the the fear from stigmatization and discrimination from consequence of injury.[29].

According to attitude of immediate reaction after injury was found in Richer (12%) were washed the site injury with soap and running water and (26%) washed with spirit which is approximately the same result of current study [22].

Saudi Arabia, Jeddah found that all students (100%) were vaccinated against hepatitis B virus [24].better than the current studies (86%) were vaccinated and only (43%) had completed vaccination against hepatitis B virus. But in study Mantosclaros was found the higher prevalence of completed vaccination among professional compare with dental students (75%) [32].

According to standard percussion in present study most of students wear gloves and mask and most of them used safety box for disposal of sharp instruments but just (23% ) uses double hand for recapping which is very poor percentage for preventing the needle stick injury this was lower than the study in south Kerala [1].and in Bolin medical college Quetta was found that  (73%) wear gloves and just (23%) were recap needle after uses which lower than the present study[30].

In this study most of students reported injury during local anesthesia administration It was the main activity that cause injures, different from study in Saudi Arabia reported scaling was the main activity [24]. And the needle was the main tool for injury .Similar studies in Ajman the main reason for injury was found to be due to needle recapping [29]. Also other many studies in Mahatma and South Africa finding the same result of the present study [42].

1. Nabila A. Sedky P d., Assist. Prof. of Community and Preventive Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry QUSA. Occupational bloodborne exposure incident survey & management of exposure incidents in a dental teaching environment. Int J Health Sci (Qassim) [Internet]. 2013;7(2):174–90.

2. Hanafi MI, Mohamed AM, Kassem MS, Shawki M. Needlestick injuries among health care workers of University of Alexandria Hospitals. East Mediterr Health J [Internet]. 2011;17(1):26–35.

3. Askarian M, Yadollahi M, Kuochak F, Danaei M, Vakili V, Momeni M. Precautions for health care workers to avoid hepatitis B and C virus infection. Int J Occup Environ Med [Internet]. 2011;2(4):191–8.

4. Ratib D, Laku R, Baba U, Yahiya O, Picozzi K. Viral transfusion transmissible infections amongst blood donors in Maridi County Hospital ,. 2014;7(1):7–9.

5. George B, Brigi C, Mulamoottil VM, Cherian SA. Awareness on infection control procedures among Dental students in a dental school in South Kerala. Heal Sci. 2014;30(3):1–7.

6. Acharya AS, Khandekar J, Sharma A. Awareness and practices regarding needle stick injuries among nurses in a tertiary care hospital of Delhi. 2014;26(4).

7. Fareed G, Hussain A, Jameel A, Akhtar M, Hussain A, Taj S. Knowledge, attitude and practices among nursing students on needle-stick injuries. 2013;7(2):357–60.

8. Efstathiou G, Papastavrou E, Raftopoulos V, Merkouris A. Factors influencing nurses’ compliance with Standard Precautions in order to avoid occupational exposure to microorganisms: A focus group study. BMC Nurs [Internet]. 2011;10:1.

9. Goniewicz M, W?oszczak-Szubzda A, Niemcewicz M, Witt M, Marciniak-Niemcewicz A, Jarosz MJ. Injuries caused by sharp instruments among healthcare workers - international and Polish perspectives. Ann Agric Environ Med. 2012;19(3):523–7.


11. Swe K, Somrongthong R, Amit B, Adinegara Lutfi A. Needle sticks injury among medical students during clinical training, Malaysia. Int J Collab Res Intern Med Public Heal. 2014;6(5):121–31.

12. Ebrahimi SF, Shadman N, Ghaempanah I. Needlestick injuries in dentists and their assistants in Kerman, Iran: Prevalence, knowledge, and practice. J Oral Heal Oral Epidemiol [Internet]. 2013;2(1):23–7.

13. Osman T. Epidemiology of sharp instruments injuries at a dental school in Sudan. Int J Infect Control [Internet]. 2014;10(4):1–10.

14. Shaghaghian S, Golkari A, Pardis S, Rezayi A. Occupational Exposure of Shiraz Dental Students to Patients’ Blood and Body Fluid. J Dent (Shiraz, Iran). 2015;16(3):206–13.

15. Saini R. Knowledge and awareness of needlestick injury among students of Rural Dental College, Maharashtra, India. Ann Niger Med [Internet]. 2011;5(1):12–4.

16. Mohohammadnejad E, Dopolani FN. Risk factors of needle stick and sharp injuries among health care workers. 2015;2(1):34–9.

17. Gaballah K, Warbuton D, Sihmbly K, Renton T. Needle stick injuries among dental students: Risk factors and recommendations for prevention. Libyan J Med. 2012;7(1):1–6.

18. Lee JJ, Kok SH, Cheng SJ, Lin LD, Lin CP. Needlestick and sharps injuries among dental healthcare workers at a university hospital. J Formos Med Assoc [Internet]. 2014;113(4):227–33.

19. Cheng HC, Su CY, Yen AMF, Huang CF. Factors affecting occupational exposure to needlestick and sharps injuries among dentists in Taiwan: A nationwide survey. PLoS One. 2012;7(4).

20. Amini M, Behzadnia MJ, Saboori F, Bahadori M, Ravangard R. Needle-stick injuries among healthcare workers in a teaching hospital. Trauma Mon. 2015;20(4):23–6.

21. Khatony A, Abdi A, Jafari F, Vafaei K. Prevalence and Reporting of Needle Stick Injuries: A Survey of Surgery Team Members in Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences in 2012. Glob J Health Sci [Internet]. 2015;8(3):245–51.

22. Guruprasad Y, Chauhan D. Knowledge, attitude and practice regarding risk of HIV infection through accidental needlestick injuries among dental students of Raichur, India. Natl J Maxillofac Surg. 2011;2(2):152.

23. Knowledge , Attitudes , and Practice of Infection Control among Dental Students at Sana ’ a. 2015;7(February):2015.

24. R MA. exploration of the incidence and responce to needle stick injuries amid undergraduate students at university dental hospital in jeddah:hazard factors and prevention. 2016;12(8):122–30.

25. Gupta N, Tak J. Needlestick injuries in dentistry. Kathmandu Univ Med J. 2011;9(35):208–12.

26. K TAR, Garwal RK, Pratima G, Priyanka G. Research Article Knowledge , Awareness & Prevalence of Needle Stick Injury Among Students of Medical College of Uttarakhand , India. 2015;6:3055–8.

27. Utkarsha Lokesh, Srinidhi D, Sudhakara Reddy K. Post exposure prophylaxis to occupational injuries for general dentist. J Indian Prosthodont Soc [Internet]. 2014;14(Suppl 1):1–3. pe=abstract

28. Shahzad M, Hassan SG, Memon MR, Bashir U, Shams S. Needle stick injuries among dental students, house officers and paradental staff working at Liaquat medical university hospital, Hyderabad. Pakistan Oral Dent J. 2013;33(1):23–5.

29. Jaber MA. A survey of needle sticks and other sharp injuries among dental undergraduate students. Int J Infect Control [Internet]. 2011;7(3):1–10.

30. Gichki AS, Islam A, Murad W. Knowledge and Awareness About Needle Stick Injuries.

31. Nimir M. Knowledge , Attitude and Practice Towards Needle Stick Injury Among Health Care Workers in a Tertiary Sudanese Hospital.

32.  Hepatitis B vaccination and associated factors among dentists Vacinação contra hepatite B e. 2012;15(2):315–23.

33. Ali FM, Patil A, Tahasildar S, Patil K. Review Article Needle Stick Injuries in Dental Clinics?: a Review. 2014;3(2):374–8.

34. Abd SA, Phd E-H. Prevention of needle stick and sharp injuries during clinical training among undergraduate nursing students: Effect of educational program. IOSR J Nurs Heal Sci [Internet]. 2015;4(4):1940–4.

35. Evans L, Sunley K, Gallagher R, Barnett S, RCN Infection Prevention Network. Wipe it out: Essential practice for infection prevention and control - guidance for nursing staff. CareFusion [Internet]. 2012.

 36.Ghasemzadeh I, Kazerooni M, Davoodian P, Hamedi Y, Sadeghi P. Sharp Injuries Among Medical Students. Glob J Health Sci [Internet]. 2015;7(5):320–5. Available from: 37.       Kukreja BJ, Kukreja P, ChhabraV, Sharma M, Kumar S, Dodwad V      Needlestick injuries in dentistry. Clinical Dentistry 2013; VII: 24-29.

38. Gambhir RS, Kapoor V. International Journal of Preventive Medicine Letter to Editor Open Access Knowledge , Awareness and Practice Regarding Needle Stick Injuries in Dental Profession in India. 2015;


40. Moodley I, Naidoo S. Percutaneous exposure incidents - prevalence, knowledge and perceptions of dental personnel and students at a dental training site in KwaZulu-Natal. Http://RefScieloOrg/Hy7Ksn. 2015;334–9.

41. Mp SK. Knowledge , Attitude and Practices Regarding Needlestick Injuries Among Dental Students. 2016;9(4):2–5.

42. Syed J, Hussain A, Ram SM, Galinde J, Jingade RRK. Occupational    Exposure to Sharp Instrument Injuries among Dental , Medical and Nursing Students in Mahatma Gandhi Mission ’ s Campus , Navi Mumbai , India. J Contemp Dent. 2012;2(August):1–10

Figure 1

Figure 2

Figure 3

Figure 4

Figure 5

Figure 6