Journal of MAR Clinical Case Reports

Description

Aim & Scope:

The International Journal of MAR Clinical Case Reports (MARCR) brought you into the world with a dream of elevating your research to the broadest network and giving high visibility and exposure to your article. We likewise guarantee your research is easy to find, making your thoughts and information available to different specialists, Networks, and Organizations around the globe.

MARCR is an open-access journal, Peer-reviewed, Medical Sciences, Monthly Issue. Indexing in web of Science, Google Scholar, SSRN, ResearcherID-Publons, Semantic Scholar | AI-Powered Research Tool, Microsoft Academic, Academia.edu, arXiv.org, Research Gate, CiteSeerX, ResearcherID Thomson Reuters, Mendeley : reference manager, DocStoc, ISSUU, Scribd, and many more.

Journal is under Q3 Category, Impact Fcator 3.81

The open-access supports the rights of users to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of these articles provided they are properly acknowledged and cited.

Why MAR Case Reports?

1. Refereed Journal and Peer Reviewed Journal
2. Publication Issue Frequency: Monthly (12 issues Per Year Annually)
3. Nominal Fee for Professional Research Services, Low-cost research journal.
4. Review Results (Acceptance/Rejection) Notification : Within 02-03 Days
5. Paper Publication Time: Paper Publish: Within 02-03 Days after submitting all the required documents.

MAR Case Reports aims to publish articles on all the areas

Academic Clinical Trials, Anatomy, Anesthesia, Bioequivalence, Biopharmaceutical, Biotechnology, Cardiology, Plastic Surgery, Cosmetic Surgery, Cardio-Thoracic Surgery, Clinical Events, Clinical Examination, Clinical Medicine, Clinical Pharmacology, Clinical Significance, Clinical Trial, Critical Care Medicine, Cancer, Dentistry, Dermatology, Drug Development, Drug discovery, Embryology, Endocrinology, Epidemiological Methods, Epidemiology, Evidence-based Medicine, Family Medicine, Gastroenterology, Gastrointestinal Surgery, General Surgery, Genetics, Geriatric Medicine, Hematology, Hepatology, Hospice and Palliative Medicine, Internal Medicine, Maxillofacial Surgery, Medicine Neurosurgery, Microbiology, Molecular Biology, Neuroscience, Obstetrics and Gynecology, Orthopedic, Otolaryngology, Pathology, Pediatrics, Pharmacodynamics, Pharmacokinetics, Pharmacology, Pharmacology, Bio pharmacology, Pharmaceutics, Pharmacovigilance, Physical Medicine, Physiology, Pulmonology, Radiology, Sleep Medicine, Sports Medicine, Surgical Oncology, Toxicology, Transplantation Medicine, Trauma Surgery, Urology.

*Annual Memberships are available to get 70% & 50% off on your Article processing fee*

Note: Preprints Available price includes Shipping charges.

Contact: Editor@medicalandresearch.com  

Submit your Paper

Editorial Chief

Editorial Board

Guidelines

Editor: The Editor Is An Esteemed And A Profound Personage Whose Decision Is Utmost Critical In The Process Of Editing, Peer-reviewing And Decision Regarding Publication Of The Article. The Editor Deeply Examines The Content Of The Article And Expresses His/her Views Regarding The Quality And Integrity Of The Article And Also Regarding Any Changes To Be Incorporated For The Best Outcome Of The Literature.

Editor’s Responsibilities:

Editors Are Requested To Express Their View Regarding The Article Whether It Falls Under The Journal Scope Or Not And Whether It Meets The Desired Publication Criteria Or Not.

Editors Are Requested To Perform Detailed Evaluation Of The Manuscript And Should Suggest For Any Further Modifications To Be Done In The Article.

After The Article Undergoes Peer Review Process, The Content Will Be Forwarded To The Editor. The Editor Should Provide The Necessary Changes To Be Carried Out In The Article To Augment Its Quality.

After Getting Satisfied With The Quality Of The Manuscript, The Editor Should Declare His/her Decision To Proceed For Publication Of The Article.

If The Article Is Worthy Of Rejection In Your Horizon, Please Explain The Grounds On Which The Conclusion Is Posed.

The Decision Of Editor Should Not Be Influenced By Any Factors.

The Editor’s Quick Response Is Very Essential To Maintain The Desired Time Constraints. In Case The Editors Are Busy With Their Work Schedule And Are Unable To Participate In The Peer Review Process, Then It Is The Editor’s Responsibility To Assign Suitable And Potential Reviewers Who Can Carry Out Efficient Peer Review Process Ensuring The Best Quality Outcome Of The Content.

Editors Are Requested To Have A Glance At The Reviewer Guidelines And Are Responsible To Ensure Quality Outcome Of The Literature Through Intense And Thorough Peer Review Process.

Editors Need To Ensure Protection And Confidentiality Of The Content.

The Contributions Of Editors Will Be A Valuable Fruit To The Journal.

Reviewer:

MAR Publications Has Laid Down The Following Guidelines For Reviewers For The Good Outcome Of The Content. Articles Submitted To MAR Publications Are Subjected To Double Blinded Peer Review Process In Which Both The Reviewer And The Author Remain Anonymous To Each Other. MNR Publications Believes That, Thorough Peer Review Process Is A Critical Factor To Yield Immense Quality Literature To Be Published In The Journal.

Criteria To Be Considered By Peer Reviewers In The Course Of Manuscript Evaluation

Peer Reviewers Are Requested To Check For The Following Requirements For Enhancing The Manuscript Quality.

The Study Should Possess Novelty And Should Present The Results Of Original Research. It Is Required That The Reported Results Are Not Published Elsewhere.

 The Manuscript Has To Meet The Publication Standards.

 The Study Subject Should Be Advanced Over Formerly Published Work.

 Possible Significance Of The Work With Regard To The Present And Hereafter.

Reviewer’s Assignments During Peer Review

1. Present Your Perspective Regarding Quality Of The Article And Provide The Area Of The Article To Be Upgraded.

2. Outline The Strengths And Weaknesses Of The Manuscript.

3. Put Forth Your Valuable Suggestions To The Author On How To Improve The Article.

4. If The Article Is Worthy Of Rejection In Your Horizon, Please Explain The Grounds On Which The Conclusion Is Posed.

5. Reviewers Are Requested To Avoid Any Personalised Statements That May Be Considered As Biased.

6. The Reviewers Need To Maintain Confidentiality Throughout The Peer Review Process.

7. Reviewers Are Not Allowed To Make Use Of Any Confidential Information From The Paper Prior To Publication.

8. Even After Publication, Reviewers Are Allowed To Use Only The Published Data But Not The Content That They Have gained From Previous Drafts During Peer Review Process.

Information Apart From The Published Content Can Be Used Only After Acquiring Permission From The Author.

 Reviewers Are Requested To Perform The Peer Review With Ensured Uniformity And Impartiality.

 We Request Reviewers To Complete The Peer Review Analysis Within The Stipulated Time Period.

MAR Publications Trusts The Genuine Peer Review Process That The Reviewers Carry Out So That It Helps Us To Publish The Content With Good Essence.

Previous Issue Articles