The Measurement of the Distance between the Anterior Cruciate Ligament and the Anterior Root of the Medial Meniscus and its Clinical Implications
Hany N Abu-Farsakh*1, Areen F Hussein2, Mohammad A Rjoub3, William R Webb4
1. Istishari hospital l, Amman, Jordan
2. Applied Science Private University, Amman, Jordan
3. Istishari hospital, Amman Jordan
4. Research and Innovation Hub, Innovation Aesthetics, London, WC2H 9JQ, UK.
*Correspondence to: Hany N Abu-Farsakh, Istishari hospital l, Amman, Jordan.
Copyright
© 2024 Hany N Abu-Farsakh. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Received: 29 Oct 2024
Published: 08 Nov 2024
Introduction
The anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) is a critical structure within the knee joint, primarily responsible for maintaining anteroposterior stability and controlling rotational forces during movement. Anatomically, the ACL comprises two functional bundles—anteromedial and posterolateral—that are tensioned during different phases of knee flexion and extension, providing dynamic stability to the knee joint 1. Injury to the ACL, particularly tears, can result in significant knee instability, often necessitating surgical intervention for active individuals 2.
The medial meniscus, a fibrocartilaginous structure located between the femoral condyle and tibial plateau, serves as a load distributor, shock absorber, and stabiliser within the knee joint 3. The anterior root of the medial meniscus is crucial for maintaining the proper biomechanics of the meniscus. Damage to the anterior root has been shown to mimic total meniscectomy, leading to increased tibiofemoral contact pressures and accelerating degenerative changes within the joint 4.
The importance of ACL reconstruction lies in its ability to prevent recurrent knee instability, which can lead to meniscal tears, cartilage damage, and early osteoarthritis if left untreated 5. The procedure is highly prevalent, with an estimated 100,000 to 200,000 ACL reconstructions performed annually in the United States alone 6. Despite the success of ACL reconstruction, one of the leading causes of revision surgery is tunnel malposition 7. Improper tunnel placement alters the biomechanics of the reconstructed ligament, resulting in graft failure, continued instability, or loss of range of motion. Accurate tunnel placement is therefore critical to the long-term success of ACL reconstruction and the prevention of revision surgeries 8.
Current anatomical landmarks, such as the anterior horn of the lateral meniscus and the tibial spine, are commonly used for tibial tunnel placement; however, they are associated with variability in positioning, leading to potential misplacement of the tunnel 9. This measurement will not only aid in ACL surgery and postoperative assessment; it will also give an insight regarding the risk of iatrogenic anterior root injury during intramedullary nailing of the tibia as the drilling of the entry point might risk injuring the root 10. The hypothesis of this study is that measuring the distance between the anterior border of the ACL and the posterior border of the anterior root of the medial meniscus on sagittal MRI will provide a consistent anatomical landmark. If this measurement is reliable, it could help surgeons achieve more accurate tibial tunnel placement during ACL reconstruction and help in the postoperative assessment of the tibial tunnel position.
Methodology
1. Patient Demographics and Study Details
A total of 151 knees from 151 patients aged between 17 and 77 were included in the study at Jordanian University Hospital. The MRI images were examined after obtaining consent from the ethics committee. The study focused on patients who underwent knee MRI scans from January 2017 to the end of 2022, utilising the Philips Ingenia 1.5 T MRI system with Omega HP gradient system.
2. Measurement Method and Parameters
Two physicians (one radiologist and one orthopaedic surgeon who had been trained in using the radiology software) performed measurements on the MRI images to prevent bias. The measurements were performed by drawing a horizontal line between the posterior edge of the anterior horn of the medial meniscus and the anterior edge of the ACL on a T2W sagittal spare image of the middle cut of the ACL.
3. Imaging Techniques
All measurements were performed on the sagittal plane with multi-slice, turbo-spin- echo, T1-weighted images with the following parameters: 540/8/1.5 (TR/TE/NEX); slice thickness 3.5 mm, inter-slice gap 0.5 mm, matrix 340×320. At the same time, T2-weighted images had the following parameters: 2500/80/1, matrix 375×320, slice thickness 3.5 mm, and inter-slice gap 0.5 mm for coronal and sagittal images.
4. Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria
Examined MRI knee scans were for patients between 17 and 70 years of age, with scans performed between January 2017 and the end of 2022 and reported by the radiologist as "normal". Scans with any reported pathological findings, previous surgeries, or deformities were not even considered.
5. Statistical Analysis
In this study, descriptive statistics were used to analyze the measured distances between the ACL and the medial meniscus anterior root. The mean provided a central value, while the standard deviation measured variability. A 95% confidence interval was calculated to estimate the range within which the true population mean likely falls, offering a measure of precision. This interval was derived using the standard error of the mean, assuming a normal distribution, to help make reliable inferences about the population based on the sample.
Results
The study included 151 patients, 87 males (54.7%) and 72 females (45.3%). The average distance between the anterior border of the ACL and the posterior border of the anterior root of the medial meniscus is 6.72 mm with a standard deviation of 1.80 mm. The 95% confidence interval for the mean is (6.43 mm, 7.01 mm), indicating that the true mean distance lies within this range with 95% confidence.
Discussion
The statistical analysis of the measured distances between the anterior border of the ACL and the posterior border of the anterior root of the medial meniscus on sagittal MRI yielded a mean distance of 6.72 mm, with a standard deviation of 1.80 mm. To assess the precision of this estimate, a 95% confidence interval was calculated, ranging from 6.43 mm to 7.01 mm. This interval suggests that the true mean distance is likely to fall within this range, providing a reliable reference for surgical planning, particularly for tibial tunnel placement in ACL reconstruction. The relatively narrow confidence interval reflects the consistency of the measurements across the sample population.
The findings of this study reveal two critical clinical implications, particularly in knee surgeries. First, the measured distance between the ACL and the anterior root of the medial meniscus highlights their close anatomical proximity. This relationship is especially important in procedures like intramedullary nail insertion for tibial fractures, where entry through the anterior proximal tibia risks damaging the medial meniscus root 17 18. Improper insertion or drilling can lead to root injury, resulting in biomechanical dysfunction similar to a meniscectomy with increased tibiofemoral contact pressure and accelerated cartilage degeneration 19 20 21 22 . These results emphasise the need to carefully consider the meniscal root during intramedullary tibial nail insertion to prevent long-term joint damage, with the possibility of moving the entry point laterally to avoid medial meniscus root injury.
Secondly, the consistency of this measurement has significant implications for improving tibial tunnel placement during ACL reconstruction surgery; it provides a reliable anatomical landmark that surgeons can reference when positioning the tibial jig through the medial portal. Current techniques for tibial tunnel placement, which often rely on landmarks such as the anterior horn of the lateral meniscus or the tibial spine, have shown variability and can lead to tunnel misplacement—a leading cause of ACL reconstruction failure and revision surgeries 23 24 . The distance measured in this study, approximately 6.72 mm on sagittal MRI, serves as a critical point for guiding jig placement. However, because the arthroscopic placement of the tibial jig is oblique to the axis of the measured distance, the effective distance on the jig is likely closer to 7 mm, providing an adjusted reference during surgery. If combined with the currently used references, the anterior horn of the lateral meniscus and the tibial eminance, this measurement ensures that the tibial tunnel is positioned in a way that closely mirrors the native anatomy of the ACL insertion, potentially reducing complications such as graft impingement or altered biomechanics 25 26 27.
Limitations:
One limitation of this study is the reliance on MRI for measurement, which, while accurate, can vary depending on imaging quality, patient positioning, and slice orientation. This variability may introduce slight inconsistencies in the measured distance between the ACL and the anterior root of the medial meniscus across different institutions or imaging modalities. Additionally, this study only evaluated the anatomical relationship in a single plane (sagittal), which may not fully capture the three-dimensional complexity of knee joint anatomy during surgery. Another limitation is that the study did not directly correlate the measurements with clinical outcomes from ACL reconstruction surgeries, leaving a gap in understanding how well these measurements translate into improved surgical success. Moreover, this study involved a limited population, which may not represent the full variability of anatomical differences in diverse patient groups, such as those with preexisting joint abnormalities or varying levels of joint degeneration.
Future Directions:
Future research should aim to validate these findings in a larger and more diverse cohort to ensure that the measurements apply broadly across different patient populations. Studies could also explore the three-dimensional anatomical relationship between the ACL and the medial meniscus root to provide a more comprehensive guide for tibial tunnel placement. Additionally, correlating these measurements with postoperative outcomes, such as graft stability, knee function, and long-term success rates, would provide clinical evidence of the benefit of using these anatomical landmarks for tibial tunnel placement. Another area for further exploration could be the development of intraoperative imaging techniques or navigation systems that utilise this measurement to guide surgeons in real-time, enhancing precision in ACL reconstruction surgeries. Finally, future studies could investigate how these measurements interact with other anatomical variables, such as meniscal slope or ACL inclination, to refine surgical techniques further and reduce tunnel misplacement.
Conclusion
In conclusion, this study highlights the consistent anatomical relationship between the ACL and the anterior root of the medial meniscus, offering a valuable reference for intramedullary tibia nail postoperative knee pain complications and improving tibial tunnel placement during ACL reconstruction. The measured distance provides a reliable intraoperative guide that can reduce the risk of tunnel misplacement, potentially enhancing surgical outcomes and reducing revision rates. Further research is needed to validate these findings in diverse populations and assess their direct impact on postoperative success. These insights could contribute to more precise, anatomically informed ACL reconstruction techniques.
References
1. 1. J. LM, F. GGirgis "The anterior cruciate ligament. A functional analysis based on postmortem studies. The anterior cruciate ligament. A functional analysis based on postmortem studies. 2, 1976;
2. Andrew A, G. PDawkins "Functional anatomy of the anterior cruciate ligament. F bundle actions related to ligament replacements and injuries. Functional anatomy of the anterior cruciate ligament. Fibre bundle actions related to ligament replacements and injuries. 2, 1991;
3. Eleftherios A, Pasha H, Kyriacos AAthanasiou "The knee meniscus: structure–function, current repair techniques, prospects for regeneration. The knee meniscus: structure–function, pathophysiology, current repair techniques, and prospects for regeneration. 30, 2011;
4. Muturi M, Lars G, Christopher DHarner "Biomechanical consequences of a tear of the posterior root of the medial meniscus: similar to total meniscectomy. Biomechanical consequences of a tear of the posterior root of the medial meniscus: similar to total meniscectomy. 9, 2008;
5. Letha Y, Julie A, Marjorie JA, Elizabeth AA, Randall WD, William EG, et al. Noncontact anterior cruciate ligament injuries: risk factors and prevention strategies. 3, 2000;
6. Nathan A, Peter NC, Mario M, Miho JT, Brian JC, Bernard RBJ, et al. Incidence and trends of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in the United States. 10, 2014;
7. Brian F, Andrew KW, Scott T, William A, James JI, Freddie HFu "Nonanatomic tunnel position in traditional transtibial single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction evaluated by three-dimensional computed tomography. Nonanatomic tunnel position in traditional transtibial single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction evaluated by three-dimensional computed tomography. 6, 2010;
8. James O, Sam Y, Mike JR, Adrian JWilson "Femoral and tibial tunnel positioning on graft isometry in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a cadaveric study. Femoral and tibial tunnel positioning on graft isometry in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a cadaveric study. 3, 2014;
9. Thomas E, Stefan M, Juergen Metz "Tibial insertions of the anteromedial and posterolateral bundles of the anterior cruciate ligament: morphometry, arthroscopic landmarks, orientation model for bone tunnel placement. … the anteromedial and posterolateral bundles of the anterior cruciate ligament: morphometry, arthroscopic landmarks, and orientation model for bone tunnel placement. 2, 2008;
10. Matthew D, Christopher ML, Mark GH, Michael BE, Travis LT, Matthew TR, et al. Intramedullary tibial nailing reduces the attachment area and ultimate load of the anterior medial meniscal root: a potential explanation for anterior knee pain in female. 7, 2015;
11. E. S, Michael VS, Robert HBrophy "Meniscal repair versus partial meniscectomy: a systematic review comparing reoperation rates and clinical outcomes. Meniscal repair versus partial meniscectomy: a systematic review comparing reoperation rates and clinical outcomes. 9, 2011;
12. Jonathan H, Anil SR, Hilary RU, Gregory SDiFelice "Meniscal root tears: diagnosis and treatment. Meniscal root tears: diagnosis and treatment. 9, 2009;
13. Christopher M, Michael BE, Matthew TR, Evan WJ, Coen AW, Lars E, et al. Anatomy of the anterior root attachments of the medial and lateral menisci: a quantitative analysis. 10, 2014;
14. G. G, A. M, A. T, M. F, A. Z, M. A-M. Comparison of clinical, MRI and arthroscopic assessments of chronic ACL injuries, meniscal tears and cartilage defects. Musculoskeletal surgery 100, 2016;
15. Muhammad SA, Nadeem Khalid "Diagnostic accuracy of MRI in assessment of M and A tear: C with arthroscopy. Diagnostic accuracy of Magnetic Resonance Imaging in assessment of Meniscal and ACL tear: Correlation with arthroscopy. 2, 2015;
16. Nicholas C, Matthew GG, Grady WM, Jennifer LPierce "Magnetic resonance imaging of the knee: A overview and update of conventional and state of the art imaging. Magnetic resonance imaging of the knee: An overview and update of conventional and state of the art imaging. 5, 2017;
17. A. KD, G. SK, W. H, D. JL, R. NVillar "Magnetic resonance imaging of the knee: assessment of effectiveness. Magnetic resonance imaging of the knee: assessment of effectiveness. 4, 1996;
18. Michael B, Evan WJ, Christopher ML, Robert FL. Anterior meniscus root avulsion following intramedullary nailing for a tibial shaft fracture. Knee Surgery Sports Traumatology Arthroscopy 23, 2015;
19. Gökhan B, Ahmet A, Akif K, Hakan Ba?ar "The effects of partial meniscectomy and meniscal repair on the knee proprioception and function. The effects of partial meniscectomy and meniscal repair on the knee proprioception and function. 1, 2020;
20. L. SLohmander "Meniscectomy and osteoarthritis: what is the cause and what is the effect? Meniscectomy and osteoarthritis: what is the cause and what is the effect? 2, 2006;
21. Mårten L, Torsten A, Ewa MR, Kjell J, L. SLohmander "Knee osteoarthritis after meniscectomy: prevalence of radiographic changes after twenty?one years, compared with matched controls. Knee osteoarthritis after meniscectomy: prevalence of radiographic changes after twenty?one years, compared with matched controls. 4, 1998;
22. L. SLohmander "Risk factors for symptomatic knee osteoarthritis fifteen to twenty?two years after meniscectomy. Risk factors for symptomatic knee osteoarthritis fifteen to twenty?two years after meniscectomy. 9, 2004;
23. Parth L, Samuel KV de V, Peter DA, Bertram Z, Thomas JG, Guoan L. Tunnel position and graft orientation in failed anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a clinical and imaging analysis. International orthopaedics 36, 2012;
24. Louis C, John BC, John PClarke "Radiographic evaluation of anterior cruciate ligament graft failure with special reference to tibial tunnel placement. Radiographic evaluation of anterior cruciate ligament graft failure with special reference to tibial tunnel placement. 2, 1998;
25. V. M, V. S, D. K, D. C, A. AA, A. DP, et al. Transtibial versus Anteromedial Portal Reaming in ACL Reconstruction: An Anatomical and Biomechanical Evaluation of Surgical Technique. 3, 2011;
26. MAJ SM, JAMES AC. Tibial tunnel placement in anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions and graft impingement. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 1992;
27. Nicholas C, Dale MD, Darrell Penner "The effect of tibial attachment site on graft impingement in an anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. The effect of tibial attachment site on graft impingement in an anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. 2, 1992;.