A Retrospective Cross-Sectional Descriptive Study of Outcomes of Children with Downs Syndrome Who Underwent Cardiac Catheter Intervention for Congenital Heart Lesions

A Retrospective Cross-Sectional Descriptive Study of Outcomes of Children with Downs Syndrome Who Underwent Cardiac Catheter Intervention for Congenital Heart Lesions

Dr Mohamed Sobh1*, Dr. Waleed El Lithy2, Dr. Salem Al Maskari3, Dr khalid Al Alawi4, Dr Abdullah Al Farqani5

1,2. Pediatric Cardiologist

3, 4, 5. Dr. Salem Al Maskari Consultant Pediatric Cardiology Intervention and Pediatric Cardiology 

Correspondence to: Dr Mohamed Sobh, Department of pediatric cardiology, National heart center, Royal Hospital, Oman.

Copyright

© 2025 Dr Mohamed Sobh. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Received: 30 Jan 2025

Published: 05 Feb 2025

ABSTRACT

Objective: Congenital heart disease (CHD) is prevalent in children with Down syndrome (DS), affecting 50.3% of cases. This study examines the demographic and geographic distribution, outcomes, and complications of cardiac catheter interventions in DS children in Oman from 2010 to 2020.  Among 807 children with DS, 55 (13.5%) underwent cardiac catheter interventions. Procedural details, outcomes, and complications were analyzed, with a median follow-up of 2.4 years. Results: The majority of catheter interventions involved device closures, including PDA (49%), ASD (28%), and VSD (21%). Residual defects decreased from 30.4% post-procedure to 7.1% at the last follow-up. Femoral artery thrombosis occurred in 16.5% of patients, predominantly with Amplatzer devices and was associated with prolonged hospital stays. Survival at follow-up was 98.2%, with one death (1.7%) reported. Median age and weight at intervention were 2.3 years and 10.2 kg, respectively. Conclusion: Cardiac catheterization in DS children demonstrates low mortality and manageable complications, with vascular issues being the most common. Improved awareness and care protocols are essential to reduce adverse events. Future studies should explore survival outcomes compared to non-DS children and assess risk factors for vascular complications.


A Retrospective Cross-Sectional Descriptive Study of Outcomes of Children with Downs Syndrome Who Underwent Cardiac Catheter Intervention for Congenital Heart Lesions

Abbrevations

ASD

Atrial septal defect

AVSD

Atrioventricular septal defect

CHD

Congenital heart disease

DS

Down syndrome

LPA

Left pulmonary artery

PDA

Patent ductus arteriosus

RPA

Right pulmonary artery

SD

standard deviation

VSD

Ventricular septal defect


Introduction

DS is the most common chromosomal with a range of morphological and structural birth defects. These include congenital mental disability, hypotonia, distinctive physical features, heart defects, and other systemic malformations. The incidence of CHD in children with DS is estimated to range from 40% to 50% (1). Atrioventricular septal defect (AVSD) is the most common cardiac anomaly, accounting for 45% of cases, followed by ventricular septal defect (VSD), atrial septal defect (ASD), and tetralogy of Fallot. AVSD is the most frequently reported congenital heart defect in Western literature (2,3). CHD is the leading cause of mortality and a key determinant of outcomes in children with DS. Vascular complications are the most common adverse events following cardiac catheterization in children (4).

Limited data exist regarding the outcomes of children with DS who underwent cardiac catheter intervention in Oman. Therefore, this study describes the demographic and geographic distribution of DS patients in Oman who underwent cardiac catheter intervention between 2010 and 2020. It also examines survival after cardiac catheter intervention and the incidence of complications (mainly femoral artery thrombosis).


Methods

This is a retrospective cross-sectional descriptive study. The clinical data were extracted from the Alshifa system for patients in Oman who underwent cardiac catheter intervention between 2010 and 2020. The study was approved by the ethical committee.

Statistical analysis was done using SPSS v26 (IBM Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). Quantitative variables were presented as mean and standard deviation (SD) and compared between the two groups utilizing an unpaired Student's t-test. Qualitative variables were presented as frequency and percentage (%) and were analyzed utilizing the Chi-square test or Fisher's exact test when appropriate. A two-tailed P value <0.05 was considered statistically significant and a P value <0.001 was considered highly statistically significant.


Results

Among the 807 children with DS, 50.3% had Congenital heart defects. Congenital heart defects were significantly more common in females (65.5%) than males (34.5%).228(56.2%) children had undergone surgical repair for an atrioventricular canal defect, 123 (30.3%) children underwent surgical procedures for congenital heart diseases other than atrioventricular septal defect (AVSD) repair and 55(13.5%) children underwent catheter intervention (table 1,2).  Additionally, 401(49.7%) had no intervention including children who had normal cardiac structures and those who experienced spontaneous closure of their congenital heart diseases. Patent foramen ovale and spontaneously closed defects were considered normal.

Table (1): Distribution of studied cases according to demographic data

Variables

N=55

Age (months)

 

Mean ± SD

10.9 ± 5.9

Gender

N (%)

Male

19 (34.5%)

Female

36 (65.5%)

Weight (Kg)

 

Mean ± SD

2.85 ± 1.80

 

     Table (1): shows that the mean age of Down syndrome cases was 10.9 ± 5.9, 65.5% were female, 34.5% were males and the mean weight was 2.85 ± 1.80.

      Table (2): Distribution of studied cases according to primary diagnosis

Diagnosis

N=55

VSD

17 (30.9%)

ASD

23 (41.8%)

PDA

31 (56.4%)

Aortopulmonary collateral

1 (1.8%)

RPA stenosis

2 (3.6%)

LPA stenosis

1 (1.8%)

 

    Table (2): shows that the most common diagnosis was PDA (56.4%), followed by (41.8%) ASD,    30.9% VSD, 3.6% had RPA stenosis, 1.8% had Aortopulmonary collateral and 1.8% had LPA stenosis.

 

Table (3): Distribution of studied cases according to associated lesion

Associated lesion

N=55

Hypothyroidism

5 (9.1%)

Hennoch schonlein pupura

2 (3.6%)

Asthma

3 (5.5 %)

cystic hygroma

2 (3.6%)

Obesity

2 (3.6%)

cystic hygroma

2 (3.6%)

Hirschsprung

2 (3.6%)

Diaphragmatic Hernia

2 (3.6%)

 

Table (3): shows that the most common diagnosis was hypothyroidism (9.1%) followed by asthma (5.5%).

Out of a total of 55 patients who underwent catheter intervention. Twenty-seven children (49.1%) underwent PDA device closure, ASD device closure was Conducted in 18 children (32.7%), as well as VSD device closure was performed on 12 children (21.8 %), Additionally three children underwent Left Pulmonary Artery (LPA) stent, Right Pulmonary Artery (RPA) balloon angioplasty and Aortopulmonary collateral device closure, each with a percentage of 1.8%. Only 2 patients (3.6%) required reintervention. Also, 4 patients (7.3%) underwent device closure for two different defects (Table 4). Most of the patients 48 children (87.2%), had follow-up at our center, while the remaining received their follow-up at the nearest peripheral centers.     

Table (4): Distribution of studied cases according to catheter intervention procedures

Cardiac cath procedure

N=55

Age at procedure (months)

 

Mean ± SD

2.9 ± 5.9

Weight at procedure (Kg)

 

Mean ± SD

11.09 ± 1.80

Type of procedure

N (%)

VSD device closure

12 (21.8%)

ASD device closure

18 (32.7%)

PDA device closure

27 (49.1%)

RPA balloon angioplasty

1 (1.8%)

Aortopulmonary collateral device closure

1 (1.8%)

LPA stent

1 (1.8%)

 

Table (4): shows that age at the procedure was 2.9 ± 5.9 months, weight at the procedure was 11.09 ± 1.80, 49.1% had PDA device closure, 21.8% had VSD device closure and 32.7% had ASD device closure.

17 children (30.5%) had a residual defect at 1st post-procedure Echocardiogram, but this came down in the last follow-up to 4 children (7.3%) (Figure 1). Moreover, 54 children (99.2%) were electively admitted. The median time between the last follow-up and the date of the procedure is 2.4(0.1-13.4) years. 1 patient (1.8%) passed away 8 months post-procedure due to chest infection (Table 5). Additionally, due to lower limb thrombosis, 9 of these patients (16.5%) experienced a prolonged hospital stay, mostly associated with the Amplatzer device (Figure 2).

Table (5): Distribution of studied cases according to outcome

Outcome

N=55

Hospital stay (days)

 

Mean ± SD

3 ± 6

Outcome

N (%)

Survived

54 (98.2%)

Dead

1 (1.8%)

Residual lesion post-procedure

N (%)

Yes

17 (30.5%)

No

36 (69.5%)

Need for reintervention

N (%)

Yes

2 (3.6%)

No

53 (96.4%)

Echo abnormalities at the last follow-up

N (%)

Yes

4(7.3%)

No

47 (92.7%)

 

Table (5): shows that the mean of hospital stay was 3 ± 6 days, mortality rate was 1.8%, 34.5% had residual lesion, 3.6% need reintervention. While Echo abnormalities at the last follow-up were seen in only 14.5%.

   

   Figure 1. Residual lesions post-procedural and in the last follow-up TTE

Figure 2. Lower limb thrombosis associated with cardiac defect and closure device type.

 

Discussion

This study assesses the incidence of complications, particularly femoral artery thrombosis, survival outcomes following cardiac catheter intervention, and the demographic and geographic distribution of DS patients in Oman who underwent the procedure between 2010 and 2020. CHD is the most prevalent structural defect observed in children diagnosed with DS, occurring in 50.3% of children with DS, consistent with the 40%-60% range reported in several studies of DS patients (5,6).

This prevalence is more pronounced in Arab countries, attributed to elevated rates of consanguineous marriage, as well as higher incidences of diabetes and obesity (7). The prevalence of CHD is higher in girls with DS (65.5%) compared to boys (34.5%), as reported by Diogenes TCP et al., 2017 and Santoro M et al., 2018(8,9).

In this study, we found that the most prevalent diagnosis among children with DS was hypothyroidism, occurring in 9.1%, followed by asthma at 5.5%. A previous study by Alkaya et al. reported a hypothyroidism prevalence of 25.3%. Congenital hypothyroidism was observed in 6 patients (1.8%) and 5 of whom had CHD (3).

DS may independently elevate the risk of thromboembolic disease in children. Vascular complications are the most frequent complication of pediatric cardiac catheterization (10). According to existing literature, the incidence rate of femoral venous thrombosis following cardiac catheterization ranges from 0% to 20% in infants and children. Similarly, the incidence rate of femoral arterial thrombosis varies between 0.8% and 40% (11).

We reported femoral artery thrombosis in 16.3% of patients (9 patients) with a median age of 6 months, consistent with findings from Kamyszek et al. (2019) and Bansal et al. (2021), which showed that patients younger than 12 months and weighing less than 10 kg were at high risk for pulse loss after catheterization. The detection rate of vascular complications increased from 8.3% to 23.4% in infants under 6 months of age following the implementation of routine post-catheterization vascular assessment using Doppler ultrasound. (12,13).

DS children with CHD had a significantly lower survival rate compared to those without CHD (14). The survival rate at one year of follow-up was 1.8%, which is lower than the rates reported by Morales-Demori et al. (2017) and Orazah Zahari et al. (2019), which indicated survival rates of 90% at one year and 80% at five years, respectively (15, 16).


Limitation

The limitations of the study include a small sample size and a heterogeneous distribution of gestational ages among the cases. Additionally, the evaluation of clinical findings related to thrombosis may show individual variations.


Conclusion

Cardiac catheterizations in children with Down syndrome (DS) can be performed with low risk. Vascular complications are the most common adverse events overall. Increased awareness of these complications has improved intensive care, which may help reduce their incidence. Future studies should compare the survival rates of children with DS who undergo cardiac catheterization to those of non-DS children with congenital heart disease (CHD) and identify risk factors for femoral thrombosis.

 

References

1. Mourato FA, Villachan LRR, Mattos SS. Prevalence and profile of congenital heart disease and pulmonary hypertension in Down syndrome in a pediatric cardiology service. Rev Paul Pediatr. 2014;32(2):159–63.

2. Ishikawa T, Iwashima S, Ohishi A, Nakagawa Y, Ohzeki T. Prevalence of congenital heart disease assessed by echocardiography in 2067 consecutive newborns. Acta Paediatr. 2011;100(8):e55–60.

3.El-Shazali O, Ahmed H, El-Shazali H. The spectrum of congenital heart defects in infants with Down syndrome, Khartoum, Sudan. J Pediatr Neonatal Care. 2015; 2:91.

4. Martin T, Smith A, Breatnach CR, Kent E, Shanahan I, Boyle M, et al. Infants Born with Down Syndrome: Burden of Disease in the Early Neonatal Period. The Journal of Pediatrics. 2018? 193: 21–26

5. Zahari N, Mat Bah MN, A Razak H, Thong MK. Ten-year trend in prevalence and outcome of Down syndrome with congenital heart disease in a middle-income country. Eur J Pediatr. 2019 Aug;178(8):1267-1274.

6. Alkaya DU, Öztürk B, Ülker AY, Bozlak S, Öztürk E, Dedeo?lu R et al. Congenital Heart Defects and Outcome in a Large Cohort of Down Syndrome: A Single-Center Experience from Turkey. Turk Arch Pediatr. 2023 Sep; 58(5): 473–479.

7. Zonouzi AAP, Ahangari N, Rajai S, Zonouzi A, Laleh M, Nejatizadeh A. Congenital birth defects among Down syndrome patients: a clinical profile. J Public Health. 2016;24:57–63.

8. Diogenes TCP, Mourato FA, de Lima Filho JL, Mattos SDS. Gender differences in the prevalence of congenital heart disease in Down’s syndrome: a brief meta-analysis. BMC Med Genet. 2017;18(1):111. ( 10.1186/s12881-017-0475-7)

9. Santoro M, Coi A, Spadoni I, Bianchi F, Pierini A. Sex differences for major congenital heart defects in Down syndrome: a population-based study. Eur J Med Genet. 2018;61(9):546 550.

10. Okel K, Gümü? A, Ayabakan C, Varan B, & Erdo?an ?. Complications of cardiac catheterization in children with congenital heart disease. Department of Pediatric Cardiology, Baskent University Ankara Hospital, Ankara, Turkey. The Turkish Journal of Pediatrics 2018; 60: 675-683.

11. Rizzi M, Goldenberg N, Bonduel M, Revel-Vilk S, Amankwah E, Albisetti M. Catheter-Related Arterial Thrombosis in Neonates and Children: A Systematic Review. Thromb Haemost. 2018 Jun;118(6):1058-1066. doi: 10.1055/s-0038-1642635. Epub 2018 Apr 25.

12. Bansal N, Misra A, Forbes TJ, Kobayashi D. Femoral Artery Thrombosis After Pediatric Cardiac Catheterization. Pediatr Cardiol. 2021 Apr;42(4):753-761. doi: 10.1007/s00246-020-02537-2. Epub 2021 Jan 25.

13. Kamyszek RW, Leraas HJ, Nag UP, Olivere LA, Nash AL, Kemeny HR et al. Routine postprocedure ultrasound increases the rate of detection of femoral arterial thrombosis in infants after cardiac catheterization. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2019 Mar 1;93(4):652-659. doi: 10.1002/ccd.28009. Epub 2018 Nov 23.

14. Syndrome on Survival Among Patients With Congenital Heart Disease. J Am Heart Assoc.2024 Jan 16;13(2):e031392. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.123.031392. Epub 2024 Jan 12.

15. Morales-Demori, R. Congenital heart disease and cardiac procedural outcomes in patients with trisomy 21 and Turner syndrome. Congenital Heart Dis. 2017 Dec;12(6):820-827. doi: 10.1111/chd.12521. Epub 2017 Jul 24.

16. Zahari N, Mat Bah MN, A Razak H, Thong MK. Ten-year trend in prevalence and outcome of Down syndrome with congenital heart disease in a middle-income country. Eur J Pediatr. 2019 Aug;178(8):1267-1274. doi: 10.1007/s00431-019-03403-x. Epub 2019 Jun 20.

Figure 1

Figure 2

analisis frekuensi scatter hitam mahjong wins 3eksperimen iteratif mahjong ways 2 scatter wildgates of olympus analisis pola perkalian terkontrolstudi sesi mikro mahjong wins 3 rtp livedekomposisi pola gates of olympus 1000 rtpmahjong ways 2 analisis rtp liveeklsplorasi data dinamis model dunia gameintegrasi model analisis data dalam digitalkerangka analitik dinamika data platformoptimalisasi sistem analisis data teoristudi dinamika data simulasi dalam digitalbermain mahjong ways santai strategicara aman santai mahjong ways tinggigaya santai bermain mahjong ways stabilrahasia main mahjong ways tanpa khawatirtips main mahjong tanpa tekanan minime5 dibalik layar bagaimana rtp harian mengendalikan arah permainane5 era baru bonus dengan kinerja maksimal di mahjong wins 3e5 evolusi rtp harian dan seni mengendalikan strategi moderne5 evolusi rtp live dengan dukungan artificial intelligence canggihe5 fakta di balik scatter dan wild mulai terkuak dari pola algoritmae5 fakta keras tanpa analisis rtp harian strategi anda sudah usange5 framework strategi modern berbasis analisis rtp harian mendalame5 hadirkan bonus inovatif dengan kinerja optimal di mahjong wins 3e5 hanya sedikit yang paham evolusi rtp hariane5 indikasi pola scatter dan wild terlihat dari analisis sisteme5 inovasi bonus terbaru dengan performa unggul di mahjong wins 3e5 inovasi rtp live berbasis artificial intelligence generasi terbarue5 insight baru scatter dan wild dijelaskan lewat studi algoritmae5 integrasi artificial intelligence dalam sistem rtp live moderne5 jangan abaikan rtp harian ini disebut jadi penentu permainan masa kinie5 jangan ketinggalan evolusi rtp harian ini mengubah standar permainane5 jejak pola scatter dan wild terlihat dari perhitungan algoritmae5 memperkenalkan bonus terbaru dengan performa maksimal di mahjong wins 3e5 mengenal bonus inovatif dengan efisiensi tinggi di mahjong wins 3e5 menguasai permainan modern lewat evolusi cerdas rtp harianawalnya terlihat picu mahjong wins viraldari hal kecil besar mahjong beranda digitaldinamika baru digital evolusi pgsoft livehal kecil justru mahjong wins trendinginovasi pgsoft peran rtp live dinamika gamekebangkitan mahjong wins pola invoatifkejadian sepele bikin mahjong wins ramaikonsistensi dalam mahjong ways kuncimahjong wins kembali mencuat pola fokusmahjong wins kembali trending pola bermainmahjong wins naik daun pola strategimengapa strategi lambat mahjong waysmengungkap slow play mahjong hasilmomen ringan alasan mahjong wins munculoptimalisasi sistem pgsfot rtp live pemainpola baru mahjong wins heboh pemainrevolusi sistem pgsoft ai rtp live gamestrategi bermain santai mahjong waysstrategi inovatif pgsoft rtp dunia gameteknik bermain tenang mahjong waysdari sunyi ke ramai pola mahjong winsdinamika spin mahjong scatter wildjangan anggap remeh scatter hitamjejak kombinasi mahjong wins scatterketika scatter kombinasi mahjong wayskunci ritme mahjong scatter putaranmembaca frekuensi mahjong wins scattermenguak susunan simbol mahjong kejutanmenguak susunan simbol scatter wildmomen spesial mahjong scatter wildrahasia pola scatter hitam munculsensasi baru setiap putaran mahjongsetiap spin mahjong terasa scatter wildsusunan simbol sering berujung scattervariasi permainan mahjong ways scattera5 ayambesara5 ayamkecila5 babibesara5 babikecila5 babisuperaws adaptasi strategi mahjong ritme evaluasiaws evolusi visual pgsoft mahjong modernaws kombinasi simbol mahjong keputusan konsistenaws manajemen modal mahjong terkontrolaws mekanisme internal mahjong transisi stabilaws observasi sabar mahjong keputusan terstrukturaws pemilahan risiko mahjong fase stabilaws risiko mahjong disiplin evaluasi harianaws scatter hitam mahjong pola proaws simbol spesial mahjong peluang optimaloke76cincinbetaqua365slot gacorstc76samurai76TOBA1131samurai76 login