Ovarian Ectopic Pregnancies: Diagnostic Dilemma and Optimizing Outcomes through a Systematic Approach to Management

Divyatha Jayaram*1 , Mandeep Singh 2, Edwin Chandraharan 3

1. Burjeel Farha Hospital Al Ain, UAE.
2. Kypros Nicolaides Fetal Medicine & Therapy Centre & Burjeel Farha, UAE.
3. Burjeel Farha, UAE.

Corresponding Author: Divyatha Jayaram, Burjeel Farha Hospital Al Ain, UAE.

Copy Right: © 2023 Divyatha Jayaram, This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Received Date: May 25, 2023
Published Date: June 10, 2023

Introduction 

Ectopic pregnancy in which refers to the implantation of the fertilized ovum outside the normal  endometrial cavity is a potentially life-threatening gynaecological emergency. It is one of the leading  causes of maternal deaths during early pregnancy. Compared to the tubal ectopic pregnancy, an ovarian  ectopic pregnancy is very rare, but may result in increased maternal morbidy and mortality due to  difficulties with timely diagnosis. We describe a case of ovarian ectopic pregnancy, and dilemma in  diagnosis. We have recommended an acronym” OVARY” to ensure a timely diagnosis. 

Case Review 

A 31 year old, unmarried woman presented to the urgent care centre with an acute abdominal pain of  3 hours .Her menstrual history suggested regular cycles and last menstrual date was 6 days  before presentation . Her past medical and surgical history was uneventful. On clinical examination,  patient was hemodynamically stable & had a generalised abdominal tenderness.  

She was investigated in the emergency department and all her routine blood tests were normal. 

As she was unmarried, due to local cultural expectations, a serum B-hCG was not initially requested,  and transvaginal ultrasound scan was not performed. An abdominal ultrasound & computed  tomography (CT) scans showed a collection of fluid ?? ascities in the pelvis (Figure 1) and hepatorenal  angle and echogenic focus at the right ovary with suspicion of cyst probably dermoid & rest  abdominal and pelvic organs were reported as normal. 

Initial diagnosis was an ovarian cyst rupture with with haemopertioneum due to the acute abdominal  pain or ascities secondary to an ovarian malignancy.  

The woman’s condition rapidly deteriorated and she appeared pale and became tachycardic &  hypotensive. A serum B-hCG was requested and the results were suggestive of an ectopic pregnancy  (3199 miu/ml with an absent intrauterine sac). 

An urgent laparascopic surgery was carried out, which confirmed haemorperioneum (Figure 2) with  evidence of “cyst rupture” on the right ovary. Both Fallopian tubes were morphologically normal. In  view of the rare possibility of an ovarian ectopic pregnancy, a biopsy was taken at the site of cyst  rupture and the specimen was sent for histopathological examination. The patient made a good  postoperative recovery. Histopathological examination confirmed an ovarian ectopic pregnancy.

Fig 1, 2, 3

Table 1

Please view attched pdf to view full figures and tables

Discussion  

We describe a case of a ruptured primary ovarian (ectopic) pregnancy, which is a very rare, potentially  life-threatening complication during early pregnancy. It accounts for approximately 0.5–3.0% of all  ectopic pregnancies, with an incidence ranging from 1 in 7000 to 1 in 2100 pregnancies. 

Primary ovarian pregnancy occurs when the trophoblasts invade the ovary leading to the implantation  of the gestational sac within the ovary and on the corpus luteum, and this usually results in the rupture  of the ovary and a massive hemoperitoneum, Ovarian (ectopic) pregnancy, based on the location within  the ovary, may be intrafollicular or extrafollicular. Intrafollicular ovarian ectopic pregnancy is mostly  primary where fertilization occurs within the ovary. In contrast, an extrafollicular ovarian pregnancy  can be either primary or secondary (1), in the latter, the fertilization occurs within the Fallopian Tube  and the gestational sac subsequently gets implanted in the ovary. 

The history of recent use of an intrauterine device (IUD) with extra uterine pregnancy should be viewed  with a high index of clinical suspicion of an ovarian pregnancy because Razeiel et al., reported that  90% of ovarian pregnancy occurred in IUD users (6). Lehfeldt et al, concluded that IUD prevents  intrauterine implantation in 99.5%, tubal implantation in 95% and none at all in ovary (7). However,  in our case we had no such history of previous IUD use. 

Diagnostic Challenges 

The pre-operative diagnosis of an ovarian pregnancy is often very challenging. The clinical  presentation is similar to those of tubal pregnancy wherein both may have amenorrhea, irregular  vaginal bleeding, abdominal pain and adnexal mass. An ovarian ectopic pregnancy is often  misdiagnosed both clinically (iliac fossa pain, same as a tubal ectopic pregnancy) and sonologically as  a ruptured tubal ectopic pregnancy, a ruptured corpus luteum cyst, a haemorrhagic cyst or an  endometriotic (chocolate) cyst of ovary. In the Middle East, due to societal norms and expectations,  the woman did not disclose her period of amenorrhoea , and as per our routine clinical practice, serum  B-hCG was not requested as the woman was unmarried to respect the cultural sensitivity . 

It is often very difficult to differentiate an ovarian pregnancy from a haemorrhagic ovarian cyst at the  time of surgery (Figure 3). Due to the rarity of this condition, our intra-operative diagnosis was a  ruptured haemorrhagic cyst. However, due to the positive pregnancy test, we took a sample of the  ovarian tissue at the site of rupture, which showed implanted trophoblasts, clinching the diagnosis of  an ovarian ectopic pregnancy.

Hallet et al (1982) studied 25 cases of ovarian pregnancies and reported that a correct surgical diagnosis  was only made in 28% of cases. In the remaining cases, it was the pathologist who made the diagnosis  [2). It is important to appreciate that an ovarian pregnancy can terminate several days before the  expected date of menstruation without any history of amenorrhea. Rimdusit et al reported 10 cases of  ovarian pregnancy, out of which six had no history of amenorrhea (3). Their findings are similar to our  case. 

If a woman with an ovarian ectopic pregnancy presents before its rupture, then, it is possible to make  a pre-operative diagnosis with a high-resolution transvaginal ultrasonography, with colour Doppler,  confirming a gestationa sac / embryo with a fetal heart beat on the ovary. Ultrasound features of an  ovarian pregnancy include. 

• Wide echogenic ring with an internal echo lucent area on the ovarian surface. The echogenicity  of the ring is usually greater than that of the ovary itself, compared to a thin tubal ring with  tubal pregnancies or corpus luteum cyst. 

• A yolk sac or embryo was less commonly seen as progression beyond early stages is  exceptional [4].  

• Other sonograpic findings like complex adnexal masses or solid cystic masses with or without  fluid in cul de sac, fluid surrounding the ovary and ovarian enlargement also result in high  suspicion towards ovarian pregnancy [5].  

In the presence of ultrasound findings strongly suggestive of an ovarian ectopic pregnancy, a  diagnostic laparoscopy will also confirm normal Fallopian Tubes with an unruptured gestational sac  implanted on the surface of the ovary. A very high index of clinical suspicion is mandatory in the  presence of a positive β HCG without an intrauterine gestation or evidence of tubal ectopic pregnancy,  and presence of a cyctic structure on the surface of the ovary. In such situations, a sample of ovarian  tissue adjacented to the “cystic structure” should be taken for histopathological examination to confirm  or to exclude the diagnosis of an ovarian ectopic pregnancy. 

Management options 

Our pre-operative and intra-operative diagnosis, based on the clinical and imaging information  available to us for a ruptured tubal ectopic pregnancy. Therefore, we proceeded with an emergency  laparoscopy with an intention to perform a salpingectomy. In the presence of haemoperitoneum and  absence of any evidence of a tubal ectopic pregnancy, and the presdence of a haemorrhagic area within 

the ovary, our intra-operative diagnosis was a ruptured haemorrhagic cyst. However, in the presence  of a positive pregnancy test, we took a biopsy to exclude san ovarian ectopic pregnancy. 

Early diagnosis and treatment of an ovarian ectopic pregnancy is absolutely necessary to ensure a  successful outcome. Seinere et al., concluded that laparoscopy is required for diagnosis and also for  effective definitive surgical management at the same time [8].  

In an unruptured tubal pregnancy, if certain criteria are met, the use of MTX is now a well-established  and, in carefully selected cases, conservative treatment with serial estimation of B-hCG may be carried  out (13). However, in contrast to a tubal ectopic pregnancy, medical treatment by methotrexate does  not have robust scientific evidence to be considered as a safe and an effective treatment option for an  ovarian ectopic pregnancy. Therefore, it is not recommended in routine gynaecological practice. Kudo  et al. were the first to successfully treat an ovarian pregnancy with MTX, followed by Shamma et al.  who used a single- intramuscular dose of MTX (50 mg/m2) (15). Mittal was the first to report an MTX  injection directly in the gestational sac (16). Spontaneous bleeding after the rupture of ovarian  pregnancy is the main complication, and high mortality rates have been reported with mortality ( 12 ) 

Therefore, surgical treatment is recommended for an ovarian ectopic pregnancy and conservative  surgical management such as ovarian wedge resection may be attempted depending on the extent of  tissue destruction. Oophorectomy is not recommended as a routine management and preservation of  ovary should be always given precedence [9]. This is because the patients are generally fertile and the  risk of recurrence is zero as no case of recurrent ovarian pregnancy has ever been documented. This is  in contrast to tubal pregnancy which has approximately 15% recurrence [10 ] 

The definitive diagnosis of an ovarian ectopic pregnancy should be made according to the Spigelberg’s  Crtiteria [11 ].  

The following 4 criteria should be satisfied: 

1. The tube on the affected side should be intact separate from the ovary. 

2. The gestational sac must be connected to the uterus by the utero-ovarian ligment. 3. The gestational sac should occupy the normal position of the ovary. 

4. Definite ovarian tissue must be present in the gestational sac wall. 

In our case, we did ovarian conservation surgery with excision of ectopic trophoblastic tissue, and  haemostasis was achieved with bipolar coagulation. The ectopic tissue was removed with an endobag  through 10 mm trocar and the specimen was sent for a histopathological examination, which confirmed the diagnosis of an ovarian ectopic pregnancy. Both the Fallopian tubes were healthy and there were  no signs of tubal miscarriage.  

We made a definitive diagnosis of an ovarian ectopic pregnancy, retrospectively, based on the intra operative findings, the declining B-hCG levels following surgery, histopathological confirmation of  presence of chorionic villi and trophoblastic tissue within the ovarian tissue. 

We have proposed the following acronym “OVARY” to help clinicians timely diagnose and  appropriately manage an ovarian ectopic pregnancy, which is a rare, but a potentially life-threatening  early pregnancy complication. 

References 

1- Check JH, Chase JS. Ovarian pregnancy with contralateral corpus luteum. Am J Obstet  Gynecol. 1986;54:155–56. [PubMed] [Google Scholar ) 

2- Hallet JG. Primary ovarian pregnancy: A report of twenty-five cases. Am J Obstet  Gynecol. 1982;143:50–60. [Google Scholar] 

3- [4] Rimdusit P, Kastri N. Primary ovarian pregnancy and the intra uterine contraceptive  device. Obstet Gynecol. 1976;48:57–59. [PubMed] [Google Scholar] 

4- Comstoc C, Huston K, Lee W. The ultrasonographic appearance of ovarian ectopic  pregnanxies. Obstet Gynecol. 2005;105(1):42–45. [PubMed] [Google Scholar] 5- [8] Ghi T, Banfi A, Marconi R, Iaco PD, Pillu G, Aloysio DD, Pelusi G. Three dimensional  sonographic diagnosis of ovarian pregnancy. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2005;26:102– 04. [PubMed] [Google Scholar] 

6- Razeiel A, Golan A, Pansky M, Ronel R, Bukovsky J, Capsi E. Ovarian pregnancy: a report of  twenty cases in an institution. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1990;163:1182–85. [PubMed] [Google  Scholar] [Ref list] 

7- Lehfeldt H, Tietze C, Gorstein F. Ovarian pregnancy and intrauterine device. Am J Obstet  Gynecol. 1970;108:1005–09. [PubMed] [Google Scholar] 

8- Seinera P, Di Gregorio A, Arisio R, Decko A, Crane F. Ovarian pregnancy and operative  laproscopy report of eight cases. Hum Reprod. 1997;12(3):608–10. [PubMed] [Google  Scholar] 

9- Panda S, Darlong LM, Singh S, Borah T. Case report of a primary ovarian pregnancy in a  primigravida. J Hum Reprod Sci. 2009;2:90–92. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google  Scholar]

10- Sergent F, Mauger-Tinlot F, Gravier A, Versyck E, Marpeau L. Ovarian pregnancies:  revaluation of diagnostic criteria. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod. 2002;31:741– 46. [PubMed] [Google Scholar] 

11- Spiegelberg O. Zur casuistic der Ovarialschwangerschaft. Arch Gynaekol. 1878;13:73– 79. [Google Scholar] 

12- Ovarian ectopic pregnancy. Jha S, Bosworth K, Quadri A, Ibrahim A. BMJ Case  Rep. 2011;2011 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] [Ref list] 

13- Stovall TG, Ling FW. Buster JE. Outpatient chemotherapy of unruptured ectopic  pregnancy. Fertil. Steril. 1989;51:535–538. [PubMed] [Google Scholar)  

14- Kudo M, Tanaka T. Fuzimoto S. A successful treatment of left ovarian pregnancy with  methotrexate. Nippon Sanka Fujinka Gakkai Zasshi. 1988;40:811–813. [PubMed] [Google  Scholar] 

15- Shamma FN. Schwartz LS. Primary ovarian pregnancy successfully treated with  methotrexate. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 1992;167:1107–1308. [PubMed] [Google Scholar ) 16- Mittal S, Dadhwal V. Baurasi P. Successful medical management of ovarian pregnancy. Int. J.  Gynecol. Obstet. 2003;80:309–310. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]