Role of High Sensitivity C-Reactive Protein (HS-CRP) as a Predictive Marker for Coronary Heart Disease Compared to Troponin I Disease in Sudanese Patients in Khartoum State.
Ashraf Alkinain* 1, Kamal Eldin Ahmed Abdelsalam 2, Ahmed Farag Mannaa 3
1. Medical laboratory scientist, Al Dannah Hospital-UAE, Laboratory Superviosr and Laboratory quality, Manager.
2. Associate Professor, College of Applied Medical Sciences - Shaqra University-KSA.
3. Clinical pathology specialist, Al Dhannah hospital UAE, Laboratory director.
Corresponding Author: Ashraf Alkinain, Medical laboratory scientist, Al Dannah Hospital-UAE, Laboratory Superviosr and Laboratory quality, Manager.
Copy Right: © 2022 Ashraf Alkinain, This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Received Date: September 20, 2022
Published Date: October 01, 2022
Abstract
Background: Heart disease may be a leading cause of death, but that do not mean we have to accept it as fate. Although many risk factors may appear to be as an earlier predictor for cardiac disease — such as family history, sex or age — but the laboratory and clinical evaluations are very important to have the final word.
Measurement of inflammatory markers as high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (HS-CRP) may provide a novel method for detecting individuals at high risk of plaque rupture. Several large-scale prospective studies (1)(2)(3) considered that HS-CRP is a probable independent predictor of future myocardial infarction and stroke among apparently healthy men and women and that the addition of HS-CRP to standard lipid screening may improve global risk prediction among those with high as well as low cholesterol levels.
Objectives: To measure the High Sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) in serum of patients with cardiac diseases and in serum of individuals with risks of cardiac diseases and compare with troponin I.
Material and methods: The study was conducted in Khartoum state, Sudan. The samples were taken from intensive care unit (ICU) of many hospitals including Khartoum teaching hospital, Khartoum North teaching hospital, Omdurman teaching hospital, Ahmed Gasim teaching hospital, Sudan Cardiac Center and International hospital. After informed consent was obtained, 300 subjects were included in this study. 150 patients were known with chronic heart disease (CHD) (positive control group), while, 100 volunteers were carefully picked out to be under suspicious of CHD and 50 healthy volunteers were selected as control (negative control group). Data was analysed using SPSS Version 22 software. P value < 0.05 was considered as statistically significant.
Results: In this study, the results of High Sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) were significantly different in (p-value = 0.000) in coronary heart disease (CHD) subjects as compared to healthy controls and risk group. Mean levels of hs-CRP in CHD subjects, risk and healthy controls were 12.13 ±2.26 mg/L, 4.17±1.26 mg/L and 0.74±0.13 mg/L respectively
Key words: High sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP), Troponin I, CHD.
Introduction
Introduction and Literature review
Inflammation plays a role in the development of atherosclerosis and coronary heart disease. Elevated markers of inflammation, in particular CRP, are associated with an increased risk of future cardiovascular events in healthy subjects, in patients with stable or unstable coronary artery disease and acute myocardial infarction (4). The most common cause of coronary heart disease is atherosclerosis with erosion or rupture of a plaque causing transient, partial or complete arterial occlusion. Heart cannot continue to function without adequate blood flow, and if it is severely compromised, death is inevitable. Several risk factors for coronary heart disease have been well documented, including hypertension, hyperlipidemia, diabetes, a positive family history of CHD, smoking, obesity and physical inactivity (5).
Highly sensitive CRP (Hs-CRP):
C-reactive protein (CRP) is the prototype acute-phase protein primarily synthesized in the liver and its release is stimulated by interleukin 6 (IL-6) and other pro inflammatory cytokines (5) . Composed of five 23 kDa subunits, C-reactive protein (CRP) is a hepatically derived pentraxin that plays a key role in the innate immune response. CRP has a long plasma half-life and is now understood to be a mediator as well as a marker of atherothrombotic disease. Highly sensitive CRP (Hs-CRP) has been shown to have prognostic value in patients with acute coronary syndromes; however, the mostpromising use of Hs-CRP has been in the primary prevention setting. Hs-C-reactive protein not only may be a marker of low grade chronic systemic inflammation but also may be directly involved inatherosclerosis (6). It can amplify the anti-inflammatory response through complement activation of endothelial cells (7). In the present communication, we assessed the high sensitivity C-reactive protein in patients with coronary heart disease with age and sex matched healthy subjects. It has recently been suggested that a marker of inflammation, along with serum cholesterol, may be critical component in the development and progression of atherosclerosis (8)(9) .
A growing body of evidence has supported the idea that cardiovascular diseases including coronary heart disease, ischemic stroke, and acute myocardial infarction, develop, at least in part, because of a chronic low-level CRP of the vascular endothelium (10)(11).
Apparently, high-sensitivity CRP (hsCRP) is emerging as the strongest and most independent predictive risk factor for atherosclerosis and cardiovascular diseases (CVD) (7)(9) . American Heart Association (AHA) and Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) issued a statement regarding use of C-reactive protein to assess risk of cardiovascular diseases. For people without an overt inflammatory disease, cardiovascular risk assessment cutoffs have been recommended as follows:
A growing number of studies have examined whether hs-CRP can predict recurrent cardiovascular disease, stroke and death in different settings. High levels of hs-CRP consistently predict recurrent coronary events in patients with unstable angina and acute myocardial infarction (heart attack). Higher hs-CRP levels also are associated with lower survival rates in these patients. Many studies have suggested that after adjusting for other prognostic factors, hs-CRP is useful as a risk predictor. The high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) assay is a quantitative analysis test of very low levels of C-reactive protein (CRP) in the blood. The hs-CRP assay is being increasingly used as a marker for cardiac risk assessment and as a prognostic tool in heart disease
Clinical Applications
Hs-CRP in Atherosclerosis and Plaque Instability/Inflammation:
With the recognition of the crucial link between arterial damage, inflammatory processes, and coronary atherosclerosis, hs-CRP estimation has assumed a vital role in cardiac risk assessment. C-reactive protein is an important pathogenic factor for atherosclerosis and induces several reactions involved in atherothrombogenesis:
Hs-CRP in Risk Stratification and Risk Assessment:
Hs-CRP levels help in cardiac risk stratification and assessment, and it are a key prognostic factor in conditions such as
High Sensitivity (also called Ultra-sensitive) C-reactive protein is known as HS-CRP, US-CRP or CRP for short. It is a protein found in the blood and what we call a "marker" for inflammation, meaning its presence indicates a heightened state of inflammation in the body. Inflammation is a normal response to many physical states including fever, injury and infection. Inflammation plays a role in the initiation and progression of cardiovascular disease.
Troponin
It has been known for 50 years that transaminase activity increases in patients with acute myocardial infarction. With the development of creatine kinase (CK), biomarkers of cardiac injury began to take a major role in the diagnosis and management of patients with acute cardiovascular disease. In 2000 the European Society of Cardiology and the American College of Cardiology recognized the pivotal role of biomarkers and made elevations in their levels the “cornerstone” of diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction. At that time, they also acknowledged that cardiac troponin I and T had supplanted CK-MB as the analytes of choice for diagnosis. In this review, we discuss the science underlying the use of troponin biomarkers, how to interpret troponin values properly and how to apply these measurements to patients who present with possible cardiovascular disease (12).
Materials and Methods
Study Design
This study was across sectional observation study to detect possibility of high sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) as a predictive marker for coronary heart disease compared to Troponin I.
Study area
The study will be conducted in Khartoum state, Sudan. The samples were taken from intensive care unit (ICU) of many hospitals including Khartoum teaching hospital, Khartoum North teaching hospital, Omdurman teaching hospital, Ahmed Gasim teaching hospital, Sudan Cardiac Center and International hospital.
Study Group
The study was conducted in Khartoum state, Sudan. The samples were taken from intensive care unit (ICU) of many hospitals including Khartoum teaching hospital, Khartoum North teaching hospital, Omdurman teaching hospital, Ahmed Gasim teaching hospital, Sudan Cardiac Center and International hospital. After informed consent was obtained, 300 subjects were included in this study. 150 patients were known with chronic heart disease (CHD) (positive control group), while, 100 volunteers were carefully picked out to be under suspicious of CHD and 50 healthy volunteers were selected as control (negative control group).
Inclusion Criteria
Participants with chronic heart disease (CHD) (positive control group), while, 100 volunteers were carefully picked out to be under suspicious of CHD and 50 healthy volunteers were selected as control (negative control group).
Exclusion Criteria
The volunteers who refused to participate in the study were excluded. Patients with renal failure, any sort of infection, autoimmune disease, cancer and pregnancy were excluded too from this study.
Ethical considerations: An ethical clearance of this study was approved by the ethical committee of Omdurman Islamic University. Informed consent was obtained from each participant before taking the samples.
From each volunteer 7 ml blood sample was taken using standard venipuncture technique in vacutainer tubes. The samples were distributed into plain container (for hs-CRP ) and in EDTA container (for troponin I).
Quality controls and managements: Blood was collected with care and adequate safety precautions to ensure test results were reliable. Quality Assurance (QA) and standard Operating System was followed for all biological and clinical tests to achieve validity and reliability of test results.
Methods of BMI estimation:
It calculates a value indicative of the fat content of the body by dividing the weight by the square of height.
Statistical Analysis Statistical Analysis
Data were fed to the computer and analyzed using IBM SPSS software package version 20.0.(Armonk, NY: IB was M Corp)Qualitative data were described using number and percent. The Kolmogorov-Smirnov test was used to verify the normality of distribution Quantitative data were described using range (minimum and maximum), mean, standard deviation and median. Significance of the obtained results was judged at the 5% level. Chi-square test was used for categorical variables, to compare between different groups.Student t-test.was used for normally distributed quantitative variables, to compare between two studied groups .F-test (ANOVA) was used for normally distributed quantitative variables, to compare between more than two groups, and Post Hoc test (Tukey) (LSD) for pairwise comparisons.Pearson coefficient to correlate between two normally distributed quantitative variables .Mann Whitney test was used for abnormally distributed quantitative variables, to compare between two studied groups .Kruskal Wallis test was used for abnormally distributed quantitative variables, to compare between more than two studied groups, and Post Hoc (Dunn's multiple comparisons test) for pairwise comparisons.
Results
Blood samples were collected from volunteers via venipuncture in fasting state.
In this study, the results of High Sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) were significantly different in (p-value = 0.000) in coronary heart disease (CHD) subjects as compared to healthy controls and risk group.
Mean levels of hs-CRP in CHD subjects, risk and healthy controls were 12.13 ±2.26 mg/L, 4.17±1.26 mg/L and 0.74±0.13 mg/L respectively (table 1-1, fig. 1-1). These observations in table 3-1imply that a subclinical inflammatory reaction has a role in atherosclerosis in coronary heart disease as shown.
Comparison of mean Serum Troponin I in between healthy controls, risk and CHD subjects was significant (p-value =0.000). Mean value of serum Troponin I in between healthy controls was 0.80 ± 0.05 mg/dl, risk was 0.06 ± 0.02 mg/dl and CHD subjects was 3.34±1.86 mg/dl respectively (table 1-1, fig1-2).
Discussion
Inflammation plays an important role in the development of coronary heart disease. Inflammation of coronary arteries is likely an important component of changes in vessel wall morphology. It has been proposed that inflammation of arteries results in an increased production of cytokines, especially interleukin 6, and activation of clotting factors, increased platelet aggregation, and smooth muscle cell proliferation.
The aim of study was to investigate the predictive value of high sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) in serum of patients with cardiac diseases and compare with troponin I ,and to measure the high Sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) in serum of individuals with risks of cardiac diseases and compare with troponin I.
This study showed clear variation in the mean level of hs-CRP with p-value of<0.05when compared between the control, risk patient and known patient as in table 1-1 and figure 1-1.While the troponin I showed no differences between the control and risk group with p-value of more than 0.05. The results showed that hs-CRP values have predictive evidence before getting attack but the result of troponin showed insignificant changes. These findings were in agreement with the results of James A(13) and Christopher Heeschen (14) .
In other hand, showed there was clear variation in the mean level of Hs-CRP between the control and risk patients (p-value = 0.000) as shown in table (1-1). But in comparison between risk and control (as shown in table 3-2) for troponin I result showed there was no differences between mean level of risk and control as shown in table (1-2) with insignificant decreased changes with p-value of 0.10. These findings were agreed with Steven E (15) who measured the troponin I levels by ELISA method.
In this is study, the mean value of the hs-CRP according to age individuals we found showed insignificant variations (p-value = 0.885) conflicting with the results of Hala Mahfouz Badran(16) who recommended that the c reactive protein in human above 42 years old is increased slightly. The discrepancy here was due to that all our patients were above 40 years old and also, this study measured hs-CRP while that study measured CRP.
In this is study, the mean value of the hs-CRP according to sex individuals (as in table 1-4) we found that the mean level in male was 12.239 mg/L, where while the mean level in female was 11.948mg/L. This result showed insignificant variation with p-value of 0. 744.This is result was disagreed with Ryuichi Kawamoto (17) whose results suggested that hs-CRP levels was greater in women than men. This inconsistency was due to difference in the study groups between the two studies, as this study was carried out in CHD patients while that stud was implemented in healthy individuals.
In this is study, the mean value of the hs-CRP when classified according to obesity, the results showed insignificant variations between the obese and non- obese groups (p-value = 0.889) as shown table (1-5). Although this result was agreed with GrazianiF (18) but it dissimilar to Kavita Shalia(19) who explained that the hs-CRP and obesity have strong correlation.
In this study, the mean value of the hs-crp according to number of CHD attack showed insignificant variation with p-value of 0.52 as shown table (1-6). This result was agreed with the report of Louai Razzouk (20).
Conclusion
The amount of the High Sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) in serum of patients with cardiac diseases and in serum of individuals with risks of cardiac diseases and compare with troponin I is cleared different .
References
1. Rizos, EC; Ntzani, EE; Bika, E; Kostapanos, MS and Elisaf, MS "Association between omega-3 fatty acid supplementation and risk of major cardiovascular disease events: a systematic review and meta-analysis.".JAMA : the journal of the American Medical Association . (2012 Sep 12). 308 (10): 1024–33
2. Underwood and Cross and James, (2009). General ans Systematic Pathology. London: Churchhilllivingstone. p. 279.
3. Dantas AP, Jimenez-Altayo F and Vila E "Vascular aging: facts and factors". Frontiers in Vascular Physiology 3(August 2012). (325): 1–2
4. Ridker PM, Glynn RJ, and Hennekens CH. C-reactive protein adds to the predictive value of total and HDL cholesterol in determining risk of first myocardial infarction. Circulation 1998 :26;97(20):2007-11.
5. Farmer JA, Torre-Amione G. Atherosclerosis and inflammation. CurrAtheroscler Rep.2002;4:92
6. Ridker PM, Bassuk SS, and Toth PP. C-reactive protein and risk of cardiovascular disease: Evidence and clinical application. Curr Atheroscler Rep.2003;5:341-349.
7. Calabro P, Willerson JT, and Yeh ETH. Inflammatory cytokines stimulated C-reactive protein production by human coronary artery smooth muscle cells. Circulation.2003;108
8. van der Meer IM, de Maat MP, Kiliaan AJ, van der Kuip DA, HofmanA, and Witteman JC. The value of C-reactive protein in cardiovascular risk prediction: the Rotterdam Study. Arch Intern Med.2003;163:1323-1328
9. Crea F, Monaco C, Lanza GA, Maggi E, Ginnetti F, Cianflone D, Giampaolo Niccoli, Thomas Cook , Giorgio Bellomo and John Kjekshus Inflammatory predictors of mortality in the Scandinavian Simvastatin Survival Study. Clin Cardiol.2002;25:461-466.
10. Curb JD, Abbott RD, Rodriquez BL, Sakkinen P, Popper JS, Yano K, Russell Pand Tracy,C-reactive protein and the future risk of thromboembolic stroke in healthy men. Circulation.2003;107:2016-2020
11. Koenig W,Sund M Frohlich M,Hans-Günther Fischer, Hannelore Löwel, Angela Döring, Winston L. Hutchinson, Mark B and Pepys.C-reactive protein, a sensitive marker of inflammation, predicts future risk of coronary heart disease in initially healthy middle-aged men.Circulation 1999;99:237-242
12. Jana A and Pahan K. Sphingolipids in multiple sclerosis. Neuromolecular Med 2010; 12(4):351-361
13. James A. de Lemos, Mark H. and Drazner, 2010;304(22):2503-2512.
14. Christopher Heeschen, Christian W Hamm, Jens Bruemmer, Maarten L and Simoons. Diagnostic efficiency of troponin T measurements in acute myocardial infarction. Circulation. 83 1991:902-912
15. Steven E,Omokhodion SI, Losekoot TG and Jaiyesimi F. Serum creatine kinase and creatine kinase-MB isoenzyme activities in perinatally asphyxiated newborns. Eur Heart J. 1991;12:980-984.
16. Hala Mahfouz Badran, Mohamed Fahmy Elnoamany, Tarek Salah Khalil and Mostafa Mohamed Ezz Eldin. Age-Related Alteration of Risk Profile Clinical Medicine: Cardiology 2009:3,
17. Ryuichi Kawamoto, YasuharuTabara, Katsuhiko Kohara, Tetsuro Miki and Tomo Kusunoki, Cardiovascular Diabetology. 2011, 10:51
18. Graziani F, Cialdella P, Liuzzo G, Basile E, Brugaletta S, Pedicino DEur J and Intern Med. Cardiovascular risk in obesity: 2011 Aug;22(4):418-23. doi: 10.1016/j.ejim.2011.04.010. Epub 2011 May 26
19. KavitaShalia, Sudha Savant,Purvi BhattIndian and J ClinBiochem. 2012 January; 27(1): 74–82.)
20. Louai Razzouk,Pasceri V, Willerson JT, and Yeh ET. Direct pro-inflammatory effect of C-reactive protein on human endothelial cells. Circulation. 2000;102:2165–2168
Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6
Figure 7